From The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2003. Oxford: Update Software Ltd. All rights reserved.

Once versus twice daily LMWH for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism (Cochrane Review)

van Dongen CJ, Mac Gillavry MR, Prins MH

ABSTRACT

Order full review
View and/or submit comments
What's new in this issue
Search abstracts
Browse alphabetical list of titles
Browse by Review Group

A substantive amendment to this systematic review was last made on 17 June 2002. Cochrane reviews are regularly checked and updated if necessary.

Background: In the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is administered once or twice daily. A once daily treatment regimen is more convenient for the patient and may optimise home treatment. However it is not clear whether a once daily treatment regimen is as safe and effective as a twice daily treatment regimen.

Objectives: The objective of this review was to compare the efficacy and safety of once daily administration to a twice daily administration of LMWH.

Search strategy: Trials were identified through the Specialised Register of the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group (last searched May 2001), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR/CENTRAL) (last searched Issue 1, 2002), by hand-searching other relevant journals, by checking cross-references and through personal communication with experts.

Selection criteria: Randomised clinical trials in which a once daily treatment regimen with LMWH is compared to a twice daily regimen in the initial treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism.

Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers assessed trials on criteria for inclusion and extracted the data independently.

Main results: Five studies were included with a total of 1508 patients. The pooled data showed a statistically non-significant difference in recurrent venous thromboembolism between the two treatment regimens (OR 0.82; 0.49 - 1.39). A comparison of major haemorrhagic events (OR 0.77; 0.40 - 1.45) and mortality (OR 1.14; 0.62 - 2.08) also showed a statistically non-significant difference between the two treatment regimens.

Reviewers' conclusions: Once daily treatment with LMWH is as effective and safe as twice daily treatment with LMWH. However, the 95% confidence interval implies that there is a possibility that the risk of recurrent VTE might be higher when patients are treated once daily. Hence the decision to treat the patient with a once daily regimen will depend on the evaluated balance between increased convenience and the potential for a lower efficacy.

Citation: van Dongen CJ, Mac Gillavry MR, Prins MH. Once versus twice daily LMWH for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2003. Oxford: Update Software.



This is an abstract of a regularly updated, systematic review prepared and maintained by the Cochrane Collaboration. The full text of the review is available in The Cochrane Library (ISSN 1464-780X).

The Cochrane Library is designed and produced by Update Software Ltd.

Update Software Ltd, Summertown Pavilion, Middle Way, Oxford OX2 7LG, UK
(Tel:+44 1865 513902; Fax:+44 1865 516918)

File Reference: AB003074.htm