From The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2003. Oxford: Update Software Ltd. All rights reserved.

Inhaled fluticasone at different doses for chronic asthma (Cochrane Review)

Adams N, Bestall JM, Jones PW

ABSTRACT

Order full review
View and/or submit comments
What's new in this issue
Search abstracts
Browse alphabetical list of titles
Browse by Review Group

A substantive amendment to this systematic review was last made on 08 June 2000. Cochrane reviews are regularly checked and updated if necessary.

Background: Inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) is a high potency inhaled corticosteroid used in the treatment of asthma.

Objectives: 1. To assess the efficacy and safety outcomes in studies that compared inhaled fluticasone at different nominal daily doses in the treatment of chronic asthma.2. To test for the presence of a dose response effect.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Trial Register (1999) and reference lists of articles. We contacted trialists and pharmaceutical companies for additional studies and searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings (1997-1999).

Selection criteria: Randomised trials in children and adults comparing fluticasone at different nominal daily doses in the treatment of chronic asthma. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality.

Data collection and analysis: One reviewer extracted data. Quantitative analyses where undertaken using Review Manager 4.0.3 with MetaView 3.1.

Main results: 20 studies (>6000 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was high. In non-oral steroid treated asthmatics with mild-moderate disease, a dose response effect was present for morning PEF; when comparing low doses (200 vs 100 mcg/d) Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) 6 L/min, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1, 10 L/min; medium-low dose (400-500 vs 100 mcg/d), WMD 8 L/min, 95%CI 1,15 L/min); and high vs low dose (800-1000 vs 50-100 mcg/d), WMD 22 L/min 95% CI 15,29 L/min). There was no dose response in symptoms or rescue beta2 agonist use. Hoarseness and oral Candidiasis was significantly higher with 800-1000 mcg/d than 50-100 mcg/d. In oral steroid dependent disease gain 2000 mcg/d had a greater effect than 1000-1500 mcg/d in likelihood of stopping prednisolone (Peto Odds Ratio 2.8, 95% CI 1.3, 6.3) and reduced daily prednisolone dose (WMD 2.0 mg/d, 95% CI 0.1, 4.0 mg/d).

Reviewers' conclusions: Effects of fluticasone are dose dependent but relatively small. Patients with mild to moderate disease achieve similar levels of asthma control on low doses of fluticasone (200 mcg/d or less) as they do on high doses (500 mcg/d or greater). In oral corticosteroid dependent asthmatics, reductions in prednisolone requirement may be gained with FP 2000 mcg/d.

Citation: Adams N, Bestall JM, Jones PW. Inhaled fluticasone at different doses for chronic asthma (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2003. Oxford: Update Software.



This is an abstract of a regularly updated, systematic review prepared and maintained by the Cochrane Collaboration. The full text of the review is available in The Cochrane Library (ISSN 1464-780X).

The Cochrane Library is designed and produced by Update Software Ltd.

Update Software Ltd, Summertown Pavilion, Middle Way, Oxford OX2 7LG, UK
(Tel:+44 1865 513902; Fax:+44 1865 516918)

File Reference: AB003534.htm